Neat people vs. Sloppy People

In this article of “ Neat People vs. Sloppy People” by Suzanne Britt, I found that this article is pretty intense.  Suzanne Britt first starts off this article by saying that “ neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people.”  After reading that statement it made me think that maybe that the author is a sloppy person and that she has a thing against clean-neat people.

In this article, Suzanne Britt start off with the sloppy type of people.  Then that she states that “ their sloppiness is merely the unfortunate consequence of their extreme moral rectitude.”  This statement made me think that all sloppy people are really morally a good person, when in fact I know that to be untrue from my personal experience.  Then she says that sloppy people live in Never-never land and how sloppy people can throw anything away.  All sloppy people give loving attention to every detail, like the prom flowers or postcards from people.  So all sloppy people don’t have the ability to throw anything away, so it just piles up to the ceiling. 

Then in this article Suzanne Britt also talks about the neat people.  Now in this part of the article she starts about how neat people are bums and clods at heart.  In this part she talks about how items in their household, like if an item has dust on it, it would have to go.  Then neat people think about throwing the children out of the house just because it would cut down the clutter in the house.  Another thing that the neat people do, is that they will only open their mail in front of the trash, and that then don’t open up the ads, or the catalogs.

In this reading of “ Neat People vs Sloppy People” by Suzanne Britt, I thought that most of the stuff that she was talking about was every extreme to both scales to the sloppy and the neat people.  I think that because I know that I’m a sloppy person but I still have the capability to throw items away when I’m done with it, now taking out the trash is another topic.  But I don’t think that this is a good paper. because of the extreme examples, and that what I feel that she does though out the whole paper.